Smaller Type
Default Size Type
Larger Type
Print This Page
Email This Page

climate change and air EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT

Marathon Oil recognizes the concern about the potential impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) and other air emissions on global climate. At the same time, we recognize the need for reliable and affordable energy to meet long-term demand, and the important role oil and natural gas are projected to play in meeting that demand. 

Air Emissions Management

Navigate Page: 2015 Air Emissions Performance | Criteria Pollutants Metrics | Greenhouse Gas Emissions Metrics | Methane Emissions Metrics

Marathon Oil remains committed to finding and developing oil and natural gas in a safe and responsible manner, which includes efforts to reduce GHG and other air emissions from our operations in accordance with our standards, policies and applicable regulations.

Marathon Oil understands that additional climate change laws and regulations may be implemented in the future as guided by national policy and supported by more comprehensive global agreements such as that proposed by the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference. Our approach to mitigating the risk of additional regulation includes understanding and mitigating our GHG emissions, evaluating climate change risk in our investment decisions and engaging with external stakeholders to understand their perspectives.

2015 Air Emissions Performance

Marathon Oil periodically evaluates and implements air emissions reduction strategies and technologies for our operations, which are described in the Emissions Overview, Methodology and Mitigation Strategies section. Emissions reduction strategies and technologies are used throughout the drilling and production lifecycle, including:

Because our business is focused on producing hydrocarbon liquids, we evaluate our performance using primarily GHG and methane emissions intensity, expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions per all hydrocarbon production.

In 2015, the Company’s gross production of hydrocarbons increased by 3 percent. However, the reduced capital spending program resulted in lower activity and production in many assets, which contributed to a 5 percent increase in our global GHG emission intensity. Global CO2 emissions increased by 8 percent, and methane emissions increased by 11 percent.



GHG emissions increased in some growth assets, and decreased or remained relatively constant in our legacy assets.

  • In Eagle Ford, while production increased by 11 percent, GHG emissions and GHG emission intensity decreased by 4 percent and 13 percent, respectively. Using central facilities to process more production contributed to this decrease by making our operations more efficient and reducing air emissions and the overall land footprint of our operations.
  • In Bakken, GHG emissions and GHG emission intensity increased by 23 percent and 10 percent, respectively. While we have connected 98 percent of the production facilities to third-party gas pipelines, flaring of associated gas due to constrained gas pipeline capacity increased GHG emissions. Across the basin, we captured an average 85 percent of produced gas and met the year-end 2015 target mandated by the North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC). Our strategies to continue reducing the amount of gas flared include enabling third-party gas gatherers to build gas infrastructure by providing our drilling plans, assisting with landowner right-of-way acquisitions and prioritizing connections to the gas infrastructure. Third-party gas gatherers began to increase the amount of gas they processed during the second half of 2015, which decreased flaring.
  • In the UK, GHG emission intensity increased by 2 percent due to production declines. However, total GHG emissions decreased by 5 percent compared to 2014 as a result of operational efficiencies such as processing gas through a single gas compressor train on the East Brae platform, which eliminated emission sources.


Marathon Oil''s methane intensity decreased or remained relatively constant in our growth assets primarily due to improvements in gas capture and operational efficiency. In Oklahoma, methane intensity decreased by 3 percent largely due to improvements in flare systems and installation of low-bleed controllers. Continuing current practice, all new wells in Oklahoma will be outfitted with low-bleed controllers. In addition, Oklahoma set an asset-wide goal to reduce methane intensity 50 percent by 2020.




Marathon Oil also evaluates our performance as a measure of total methane emissions as a percentage of total hydrocarbon produced and total methane emissions as a percentage of natural gas produced. Our overall methane emissions ratio remains flat at 0.3 percent.

  • Methane increases in Bakken were primarily due to increased fugitive emissions from having more facilities and their associated flaring.
  • Our operations in Equatorial Guinea, which account for 56 percent of our total natural gas production, have the Company’s lowest methane emissions ratio of 0.1 percent.

Criteria pollutant emissions, which include nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and sulfur oxides (SOx), increased from 2014 to 2015. Criteria pollutant emission intensity increased by 22 percent. We manage our criteria pollutant emissions in accordance with applicable emissions control regulations. In countries that do not have emission control regulations, we comply with applicable World Bank Guidelines for air quality.



Was the content above complete, balanced and credible?

Full Survey »